Mercury Bay Yacht Club: Documents

|
America's Cup 1988 An issue of contention in the current America's Cup challenge involves objections raised by the Defender, Société Nautique de Genève (SNG) represented by Alinghi, about Golden Gate YC's Notice of Challenge and their Custom House Registry. Alinghi accuses the challenger of refusing to provide required information, provoking Alinghi to seek a legal appeal. See Alinghi Press Release regarding appeal Golden Gate YC and BMW Oracle dispute that the information Alinghi seeks is required at this time under the Deed. See GGYC Background Statement
Update, May 6, 2008: The two parties exchanged letters
regarding the Custom House Registry issue, still taking the positions
declared previously. See the following posted at the GGYC web site,
all in pdf format: Updated May 4, 2009: Alinghi reportedly filed a motion in the New York Supreme Court on May 1, 2009, to disqualify Golden Gate YC as challenger, with Alinghi citing that the Custom House Registry has not yet been submitted to the Defender. Mercury Bay Documents: The 1887 Deed of Gift requires that a challenger "...give ten months' notice in writing naming the days for the proposed races..." at the time the challenge is filed. The Deed of Gift also requires certain information to be included in the Notice of Challenge and that registry information to be sent to the Defender.
Following the 1887 Deed of Gift, races for the America's Cup from 1887 until 2007 were sailed under mutual consent between Defender and Challenger with the exception of the 1988 challenge from New Zealand's Mercury Bay Boating Club. Since that club was held to be a valid challenger by the New York State Supreme Court, it may be of interest to examine the challenge documents that Mercury Bay provided under the Deed:
Notice of Challenge:
Custom-House Registry:
What is a Custom-House Registry? Historically the registry was meant to help confirm the nationality of the vessel, and in conjunction with the implied cargo capacity, allow calculation of customs duties and other fees. Aside from calculating dunnage, the identifying information for the vessel also helped protect against attempts to disguise the origins of a ship, whether illicitly by her owners or in cases of theft or hijacking. The practice of issuing and maintaining a Custom-House Registry, along with the role of the Custom House in registering ships, was abandoned by the late 1960s in the United States. The most similar documentation available from the US Coast Guard today is a Certificate of Documentation, which can also be used as the basis for foreign registry (see USCG National Vessel Documentation Center). Depending on a complicated combination of factors, the vessel may be measured in different ways and the data required for the certificate may vary as well. In some situations the owner may elect different forms of measurement, some very simplified, others detailed. In short, there is plenty of room for interpretation as to what comprises the modern day equivalent of a Custom-House Registry, in addition to the obvious dispute between the parties regarding what "as soon as possible" might mean. Alinghi might be expected to argue that the Deed of Gift requirement is that the registry be obtained as soon as possible in order that it can then be sent, while Golden Gate YC likely interprets the requirement to mean that the registry be sent as soon as possible after it has been obtained. Complicating the situation is the aspect that an America's Cup Challenger is by nature a yacht undergoing intense technical development, the demands of which may direct changes that would affect the measurements contained in a Custom-House Registry, were one to exist, and that ongoing technological development in preparation for the racing could require that a new Registry or Registries be issued. Obtaining a Custom-House Registry, it can be argued, would freeze many of the significant development options for the challenging yacht at the time that measurement is performed. Considering that under the Deed of Gift that the challenging vessel's basic parameters have to be submitted at the time Notice of Challenge is filed, it is not clear that the requirement of Custom-House Registry information is intended to provide the defender with significant additional information about the challenger or whether it is instead intended to help confirm that the as-built measurements of the challenging vessel are correctly represented in the Notice of Challenge.
|
Inquires please contact: